|
Key Tenets about the Composition
Process
Critique and Reflection
Mentoring
Guidelines
Composers and Mentors
History
Participating
Schools
Partners and
Organizations
Board of Directors
|
Reflection and Critique in the Classroom
In a comprehensive music program, each aspect of the
program informs the rest. Students bring to their compositions all of
the musical experiences that they have, including singing, playing
instruments, movement, improvisation, music literacy, exposure to
different cultures and styles of music, as well as their personal
preferences. If reflection and critique are a part of the culture of a
classroom, with students critiquing their own and others' work, their
ability to listen, analyze and describe music (National Standard #6)
and to evaluate music and music performances (National Standard #7) is
enhanced, and this in turn enriches their compositions.
Reflection and critique are skills that must be taught. They must
be planned, guided by the teacher in the classroom and practiced. As
students compose with technology, many for the first time, they are
awash in possibilities and excited to be creating. Focusing on specific
musical elements gives a direction and form to their compositions.
As accomplished in the Vermont MIDI Project, the practice of reflection
begins with a Description of Piece.
The young composers describe what they want to convey to the listener.
When the work is posted to the website, they also include a brief
profile of the student or group, including age, musical background, as
well as the specific assignment. The young composers then Request Feedback, directing the
listeners to specific areas of their piece that they would like help
with. Often, this is difficult for the students to do, as they really
are happy with the way things are, but it does help to open them up to
receiving suggestions from others. The statement of intent is
particularly important both in focusing the student on the qualities of
their composition and in giving the people critiquing a context for
their comments. |
"Students have an
investment in their creative work, and there must be a balance between
just making changes that people suggest without taking ownership in the
piece, and digging in their heels and refusing to look at something
with fresh eyes. To me it is a delicate balance."
Anne K. Hamilton |
|
|
|
Students should view and listen to each other's work
frequently. They learn new ideas from each other and use them in their
own pieces. As they develop more musical vocabulary, they discuss the
music itself, not individuals, and this helps to depersonalize the
critique. It takes time to teach critique, and it may seem that the
investment is not worthwhile at the beginning, but as the class builds
skills in this area, their comments are more insightful, the process
runs more smoothly, and the impact on their future work is significant.

|
"We are nurturing young,
creative spirits. They are a precious commodity and our responsibility
is to respect their ideas while guiding them and helping to build their
skills."
Carolyn Keck |
| Critique as a skill can be assessed. The
Vermont MIDI project uses a three-point rubric to rate students'
comments. The rubric can be posted and referred to as work is discussed
in class. |
|
Generic Rubric for Assessing Student Responses
|
|
Level 1
|
Gives general comments that could apply to other situations as well as
the one under discussion.
|
|
Level 2
|
Accurately describes the area being discussed.
Uses a mix of arts vocabulary and general terms.
|
|
Level 3
|
Accurately describes the area being discussed. Gives detailed examples,
references, connections or responses to general insights. Uses arts
vocabulary.
|
|
Adapted from the
Vermont Arts Assessment Project 1995
|
|
Some Approaches to Critique
- The students have to be specifically instructed in how to
comment on other people's work. Critique should be positive, respectful
and specific.
- Brainstorming appropriate vocabulary and posting it in the
classroom give students a ready reference when they are stuck for
something to say.
- Frequent, short, focused critique sessions are most
productive
- Critique should be relevant to what the students are
learning in class and appropriate to their grade level.
- Look also at the work of great composers, e.g. Beethoven
"Ode to Joy". Study the rhythmic, melodic and harmonic elements,
repetition, form, etc. What makes a great melody?
- The visual aspect is important- if you do not have a
projector, print the music out on an overhead transparency so that
everyone can see the notation as the music is played.
- Affective comments are appropriate and should not be
discouraged. If a student says "Wow, that reminds me of a circus!" it
will generate a rich discussion of the music.
- On occasion show the written music to the students
before they hear it and ask them to predict what it will sound like.
After hearing it, was it what they thought it would be?
- Have the students listen to the music without seeing it and
respond to it both by affective comments and using musical vocabulary.
Then show them what it looks like in notation.
- Make a checklist of every student in the class and
throughout the quarter make sure that each one contributes a comment in
class. Assess the level of comment on the three point rubric (above).
- Written responses are tangible evidence of students'
ability to critique. They may also reach the student that is less
likely to contribute verbally.
|